For radiomics to be accepted as a definite tool in medicine, the outputs must be robust, repeatable and reliable. Image processing alters the quality of the input data which might have an impact on the values of the extracted features and ultimately the signatures developed. This study evaluated the magnitude of the influence of various interpolation and post-acquisition processing methods on the radiomic feature values extracted from planar images and radiomic signatures. Three different interpolation methods were applied to a chest x-ray dataset before 2-dimesional (2D) radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics. The influence of image size, cropping and re-segmentation were also evaluated by changing the respective variable before applying bilinear interpolation and extracting 2D features. ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni corrections were used to assess the differences in the radiomic feature values. Of the 93 first order- and texture- features extracted, 42 texture features (56.8%) proved to be significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the interpolation method. Only 2 first order features (10.5%) were significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the image size and 62 texture features (83.8%) by the other pre-processing methods evaluated. Pearson’s Correlation Analysis was then applied to develop a separate radiomics signature from each of the six image processing datasets under consideration. Five identical signatures were developed, with only the uncropped dataset that resulted in a unique signature. This study showed that the interpolation algorithms and other processing applied to planar images do have a noticeable influence on most radiomic feature values extracted. But regardless of the differences seen in the feature values, the radiomic signatures were reproducible for most datasets using different image processing methods.
| Published in | International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13 |
| Page(s) | 34-41 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Radiomics, Image Processing, Interpolation, Chest X-rays, Radiomic Signatures
| [1] | van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, et al. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer research 2017; 77: e104-e107. |
| [2] | Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magnetic resonance imaging 2012; 30: 1234-1248. |
| [3] | Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S, Origgi D, Fanciullo C, Morganti AG, et al. Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. European Radiology Experimental 2018; 2: 1-8. |
| [4] | Zhou M, Scott J, Chaudhury B, Hall L, Goldgof D, Yeom KW, et al. Radiomics in Brain Tumor: Image Assessment, Quantitative Feature Descriptors, and Machine-Learning Approaches. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2018; 39: 208-216. |
| [5] | Feng B, Chen X, Chen Y, Liu K, Li K, Liu X, et al. Radiomics nomogram for preoperative differentiation of lung tuberculoma from adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary solid nodule. European Journal of Radiology 2020; 128. |
| [6] | Feng B, Chen X, Chen Y, Lu S, Liu K, Li K, et al. Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas. European Radiology 2020. |
| [7] | Hu Y, Zhao X, Zhang J, Han J, Dai M. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features to distinguish solitary lung adenocarcinoma from tuberculosis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2020. |
| [8] | Bei W, Min L, He M, Fangfang H, Yan W, Shunying Z, et al. Computed tomography-based predictive nomogram for differentiating primary progressive pulmonary tuberculosis from community-acquired pneumonia in children. In: BMC Medical Imaging, 2019; 1-11. |
| [9] | Giraudo C, Frattin G, Fichera G, Motta R, Stramare R. A practical integrated radiomics model predicting intensive care hospitalization in COVID-19. Critical care (London, England) 2021; 25: 145. |
| [10] | Han Y, Chen C, Tang L, Lin M, Jaiswal A, Ding Y, et al. Using Radiomics as Prior Knowledge for Abnormality Classification and Localization in Chest X-rays. In, 2020. |
| [11] | Avanzo M, Wei L, Stancanello J, Vallières M, Rao A, Morin O, et al. Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics. Medical physics 2020; 47: e185-e202. |
| [12] | van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging—“how-to” guide and critical reflection. Insights into Imaging 2020; 11: 91. |
| [13] | Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: Standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 2020; 295: 328-338. |
| [14] | Acharya T, Tsai P-S. Computational foundations of image interpolation algorithms. Ubiquity 2007; 2007: 1-17. |
| [15] | Chassagnon G, Vakalopoulou M, Paragios N, Revel MP. Artificial intelligence applications for thoracic imaging. European Journal of Radiology 2020; 123. |
| [16] | Dixon SAP. Using Deep Learning to Segment Chest X-Rays for the Analysis of Pneumonia. In: School of Biomedical Engineering: University of Sydney, 2019. |
| [17] | Havlicek LL, Peterson NL. Robustness of the Pearson Correlation against Violations of Assumptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976; 43: 1319-1334. |
| [18] | Altazi BA, Zhang GG, Fernandez DC, Montejo ME, Hunt D, Werner J, et al. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2017; 18: 32-48. |
| [19] | Bailly C, Bodet-Milin C, Couespel S, Necib H, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Ansquer C, et al. Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials. In: PLOS ONE, 2016. |
APA Style
Tamarisk Du Plessis, Gopika Ramkilawon, Christophe Van de Wiele, Mike M. Sathekge. (2023). The Influence of Post-Acquisition Image Processing on a Radiomic Signature Constructed from Planar Images. International Journal of Medical Imaging, 11(2), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13
ACS Style
Tamarisk Du Plessis; Gopika Ramkilawon; Christophe Van de Wiele; Mike M. Sathekge. The Influence of Post-Acquisition Image Processing on a Radiomic Signature Constructed from Planar Images. Int. J. Med. Imaging 2023, 11(2), 34-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13
AMA Style
Tamarisk Du Plessis, Gopika Ramkilawon, Christophe Van de Wiele, Mike M. Sathekge. The Influence of Post-Acquisition Image Processing on a Radiomic Signature Constructed from Planar Images. Int J Med Imaging. 2023;11(2):34-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13,
author = {Tamarisk Du Plessis and Gopika Ramkilawon and Christophe Van de Wiele and Mike M. Sathekge},
title = {The Influence of Post-Acquisition Image Processing on a Radiomic Signature Constructed from Planar Images},
journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {34-41},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20231102.13},
abstract = {For radiomics to be accepted as a definite tool in medicine, the outputs must be robust, repeatable and reliable. Image processing alters the quality of the input data which might have an impact on the values of the extracted features and ultimately the signatures developed. This study evaluated the magnitude of the influence of various interpolation and post-acquisition processing methods on the radiomic feature values extracted from planar images and radiomic signatures. Three different interpolation methods were applied to a chest x-ray dataset before 2-dimesional (2D) radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics. The influence of image size, cropping and re-segmentation were also evaluated by changing the respective variable before applying bilinear interpolation and extracting 2D features. ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni corrections were used to assess the differences in the radiomic feature values. Of the 93 first order- and texture- features extracted, 42 texture features (56.8%) proved to be significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the interpolation method. Only 2 first order features (10.5%) were significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the image size and 62 texture features (83.8%) by the other pre-processing methods evaluated. Pearson’s Correlation Analysis was then applied to develop a separate radiomics signature from each of the six image processing datasets under consideration. Five identical signatures were developed, with only the uncropped dataset that resulted in a unique signature. This study showed that the interpolation algorithms and other processing applied to planar images do have a noticeable influence on most radiomic feature values extracted. But regardless of the differences seen in the feature values, the radiomic signatures were reproducible for most datasets using different image processing methods.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Influence of Post-Acquisition Image Processing on a Radiomic Signature Constructed from Planar Images AU - Tamarisk Du Plessis AU - Gopika Ramkilawon AU - Christophe Van de Wiele AU - Mike M. Sathekge Y1 - 2023/05/18 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13 T2 - International Journal of Medical Imaging JF - International Journal of Medical Imaging JO - International Journal of Medical Imaging SP - 34 EP - 41 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-832X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20231102.13 AB - For radiomics to be accepted as a definite tool in medicine, the outputs must be robust, repeatable and reliable. Image processing alters the quality of the input data which might have an impact on the values of the extracted features and ultimately the signatures developed. This study evaluated the magnitude of the influence of various interpolation and post-acquisition processing methods on the radiomic feature values extracted from planar images and radiomic signatures. Three different interpolation methods were applied to a chest x-ray dataset before 2-dimesional (2D) radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics. The influence of image size, cropping and re-segmentation were also evaluated by changing the respective variable before applying bilinear interpolation and extracting 2D features. ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni corrections were used to assess the differences in the radiomic feature values. Of the 93 first order- and texture- features extracted, 42 texture features (56.8%) proved to be significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the interpolation method. Only 2 first order features (10.5%) were significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.05) by the image size and 62 texture features (83.8%) by the other pre-processing methods evaluated. Pearson’s Correlation Analysis was then applied to develop a separate radiomics signature from each of the six image processing datasets under consideration. Five identical signatures were developed, with only the uncropped dataset that resulted in a unique signature. This study showed that the interpolation algorithms and other processing applied to planar images do have a noticeable influence on most radiomic feature values extracted. But regardless of the differences seen in the feature values, the radiomic signatures were reproducible for most datasets using different image processing methods. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -
Email: